Давыденко сыграет в Монте-Карло

Рановато как-то..Лучше поберечься.
И вообще,Тарпищев что,личный тренер Давыденко,что-бы делать такие заявления?

а где спорщики-то? ))

Предлагаю Гале сделать аватары для проигравших. Носить весь турнир. За наколки надо отвечать)))
Гала, сможешь чонить забористое зафигачить??)))

Бгг.
Дискуссией насалдилась немало.

Рамку!

Неужели кто-то думает что я буду спорить с «кондукторшами & Co», завтра 9 апреля и каждый из нас своими глазами увидит кто из нас был прав, - «Давыденко будет играть квалификацию»...

самый интригующий вопрос дискуссии - логика. согласно VATE-I теннисист может заявится на турнир в последний день и, если он по рейтингу выше кого-то из 58 участников энтри листа, попасть в основную сетку, вытеснив кого-то в квалификацию. зачем тогда марри в этом году и федерер в прошлом просили вк?

нашли с кем связаться
люди, не тратьте свое время непонятно на кого и на что)

И каков приговор в конце концов?

17 декабря 2009


UPDATE: Yanina Wickmayer and Xavier Malisse have been removed from the list of suspended players and are now eligible to play tournaments. Will Craig Tiley give a wildcard to Wicky, who is obviously grossly over-qualified for the qualification rounds?



1. Despite having her one year ban suspended, the ITF claims that Yanina Wickmayer is still not eligible to play.

ITF spokesman Nick Imison said Tuesday that both players are still banned ”until such point that we receive any further communication to suggest otherwise”.

Imison said the ITF is waiting to hear from the Belgian national anti-doping agency before it can make a formal ruling of their eligibility.

“Basically, it’s up to (them) to liaise with the Belgian court and make its decision based on that and inform us. As of last night, we hadn’t received any official correspondence at all.”

Since the Belgian ruling, Wicky was offered a wildcard to play at Auckland. She is also hoping for a wildcard to the Australian Open.

But the ITF maintains that the ban is still in force. “At this precise moment, she is ineligible to play,” Imison said.

“From our point of view, procedures are clear, and that if a decision is made by a national anti-doping authority, then these are sent though to us and then the ITF needs to make sure proper procedure has been followed,” Imison said. “At this stage, all we can say is that we await to receive the kind of relevant documentation and ruling from Belgium.”

Questions left unanswered:

1. Does the Belgian court actually have jurisdiction for this or is it purely advisory?
2. If the Belgian court does have jurisdiction over the matter, then surely its decision voids the bans?
3. On what authority then does the ITF or the Belgian national anti-doping authority propose to ‘liaise’ with a Court or to even consider the ban to be still in place after a court ruling declaring otherwise? The last time I checked, being assholes isn’t a legitimate ground.
4. In addition to domestic courts, Wickmayer and Malisse have also appealed to the Court of Arbitration and the European Human Rights Commission. So whose decision counts here? Is the ITF bound to listen to any of these so-called courts, commissions or tribunals?

One thing is for certain, you won’t find the answer to any of these in the media coverage on the matter. Most reports seem to accept that the ITF is free to just ignore a court ruling and Wickmayer can appeal to whoever the hell she wants. But what are the implications?

Does anyone – the ITF, WADA, the tournaments, Wickmayer and Malisse themselves included – actually know what’s going on?

Внимательно прочтите, думаю поймёте почему она играл квали...

жаль Роджа не будет,без грунтового короля турнир теряет вес...